![]() Aurora hdr pro pro#Aurora HDR 2018 is available for MacOS and Windows.īoth Photomatix Pro 6 and Aurora HDR 2018 are priced at $99. Photomatix Pro 6 is available for Window, MacOS, and Linux (though the Linux version has fewer features). Winner: Aurora HDR 2018 Platform Availability There is more detail in the shadows in the Photomatix Pro 6 version (which makes the image feel a bit flat) and more contrast in the Aurora HDR 2018 version. The sharpness of both images is roughly the same. Photomatix Pro 6 on the left, Aurora HDR 2018 on the right Please note that they were not my focus point and are slightly blurred due to depth of field. In the example below I used the selective deghosting in Photomatix Pro 6 and the ‘medium’ setting in Aurora HDR 2018 to remove ghosts from the flag and water. You can select the areas of your photograph where there was movement and the deghosting will only be applied to those areas thus preserving the quality of the rest of the image. Photomatix Pro 6 also offers a selective deghosting tool that works really well. Both apps offer the option of global deghosting which applies the effect to the entire image. Unfortunately, as you add more deghosting you increase the likelihood of unwanted artifacts such as halos and noise. Aurora hdr pro series#Photomatix Pro 6 and Aurora HDR 2018 both have deghosting tools that will minimize/remove artifacts from objects that were moving as you captured your series of images. Winner: Aurora HDR 2018 Deghosting – Selective vs. It is quick (virtually instantaneous) but it doesn’t show the addition or reduction of an effect as you are moving the slider. You move the slider, release the mouse button, then the effect preview shows. Photomatix Pro 6’s sliders are not responsive. Once you are in the app and working on your photo, Aurora HDR 2018’s sliders are very responsive, meaning that as you move the slider the preview changes. I timed a few processes with my smartphone stopwatch but it was hard to get a precise comparison as each program works a bit differently on import with steps requiring user input throughout the process. Further stylistic edits (contrast, sharpen, crop, and straighten) require that you finalize these settings before moving on to the next step.īoth Photomatix Pro 6 and Aurora HDR 2019 work roughly equally well on my mid-2015 Macbook Pro. The main editing screen (shown above) is primarily for tone-mapping. Photomatix Pro 6’s interface feels a bit cluttered. While both apps are thoughtfully designed and laid out, the layout and overall look and feel are completely different. All available tools are easy to find and available on a single screen. While both apps are thoughtfully designed and laid out, the layout and overall look and feel are very different.Īurora HDR 2019’s layout is sleek and modern. Once you’re finished, you can then manually import the new merged file back into your Lightroom library. If you want to use your raw files you’ll have to find the original images on your hard drive and then open them directly into Photomatix Pro. Photomatix Pro 6 also has a Lightroom plugin, BUT it only allow for exporting TIFFs. If you’d prefer to do your raw conversion in Lightroom and send TIFFs to Aurora, you can do that too. When working with HDR, I highly recommend working with raw (unedited) files.Īurora HDR 2019 makes it incredibly simple! Aurora’s Lightroom plugin allows you to export your raw files to Aurora and then once you apply your changes the image will return to Lightroom as a TIFF. Most photographers I know depend on Lightroom for image management and raw conversion. Aurora hdr pro software#(Be sure to check with Skylum Software and/or HDRSoft – the makers of these applications – to ensure that your camera model’s raw file format is supported.) Winner: TIE Lightroom Compatibility Luckily, both Photomatix and Aurora offer raw file support. In most cases I’ve found that processing raw files with HDR software produces the best results in terms of color and depth. Roanoke River Lighthouse | Edenton | North Carolina RAW Support I’ll dive into a few of the differences below and show how they affect my workflow.įor this review I’m working with the following image set, captured handheld with my Canon 6D and 16-35mm f/4L lens. I own (and use) both and while they ultimately have similar jobs, they each have their areas of strength. There are many HDR software options on the market, but Photomatix Pro 6 and Aurora HDR 2019 are two of the most popular. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |